It is unclear whether the import prohibition set out in the Customs Tariff for Tariff Code Item 9897 prohibits goods made in China’s detention camps. Tariff Item 9897 prohibits the importation of a number of goods, including “[g]oods manufactured or produced wholly or in part by prison labour”. Unlike the United States, Canada’s import prohibition does not extend the import prohibition to “goods manufactured by forced labour”.
Under Canadian law, any goods can be imported unless there is an explicit prohibition in a law or regulation. All of the prohibitions in Tariff Item 9897 are unilaterally selected and listed by Canada, and do not require approval by the United Nations or any international organization. Since Canada does not specifically exclude goods manufactured by forced labour, there is a real question as to whether the prohibition would apply to goods manufactured by Uyghurs in detention camps. This is why I want to raise the issue.
D-Memorandum D9-1-6 “Goods Manufactured or Produced Wholly or in Part by Prison Labour”, which is the CBSA’s administrative guidance on this matter, is silent about goods produced in Uyghur detention camps. As a result, the CBSA officers on the front line are not being told to detain goods manufactured by forced labour and contrary to human rights.
Canada can amend the Customs Tariff to ensure any prohibition is clear as to what goods are prohibited. Canada can also add clarity to D-Memorandum D9-1-6, which has not been amended since 2012. I hope that Canada takes this important step.
As reported by China Law Blog, on May 1, 2020, United States CBP issued a withhold release order (“WRO”) against hair products manufactured by a Xinjiang company called Hetian Haolin Hair Accessories Co. Ltd. There are many WROs against goods from China. Canadian companies should be mindful of the WROs as goods transshipped via the United States can be detained. More importantly, the WROs, including the May 1, 2020 WRO, provide guidance to Canadian companies who wish to act responsibility and do not wish to support the human rights abuses in the Uyghur detention camps.

The Canada Border Services Agency (“CBSA”) has created a new dedicated
On May 6, 2020, the Canada Border Services Agency (“CBSA”) published 
When it was announced that Canada, the United States and Mexico had reached an agreement to amend the North American Free Trade Agreement (“NAFTA”), one of the important changes was an increase to the de minimis threshold, which is the monetary value of courier shipments that can enter Canada without payment of duties and taxes. On May 2, 2020, the Canada Border Services Agency (“CBSA”) posted
In a recent ruling on February 24, 2020, the Canadian Federal Court determined in the decision of
Many Canadian import businesses have implemented remote working arrangements for employees as a result of COVID-19 government directives. Social distancing in business organizations can give rise to costly mistakes because business is not as usual. Importers have to adjust to the new normal and identify new (and existing) business risks. Most employees and managers are working from home, which means the control over information is diminished or, quite frankly, non-existent. While there are hundreds of issues that arise in the remote working / teleworking environment, we are going to share a “top ten list” to get you thinking.
As of
Most Canadian export controls and controlled goods compliance programs are built with the assumption that relevant employees who have access to controlled goods and technical data will be working in an on-site work environment and use work computers and in-house servers where information is securely stored with access and release restrictions and where work-related activities are carefully reviewed and watched. The current COVID-19 situation where most employees are working remotely from home was not contemplated as the export controls and controlled goods compliance program was not contemplated as being a possibility. In fact, many compliance programs have a built in assumption that workers who have access to export controlled technical data will never be working from remote premises.
We now know the dated that the Canada-United States- Mexico Agreement (CUSMA) (or USMCA under US terminology) will enter into effect to replace the North America Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA): July 1, 2020. This does not mean that the governments are ready to enforce CUSMA – Canada, United States and Mexico must now negotiate and publish Uniform Regulations (that is, harmonized regulations relating to customs matters). There will be new regulatory changes that will be announced over the next weeks leaving less time for you to get ready. It is best to start now.