It looks like the Canadian International Trade Tribunal (“CITT”) has not yet been selected by the Federal Government of Canada or any province or territory as the reviewing authority under Chapter Five of the Canadian Free Trade Agreement (Canada’s new and improved internal trade agreement). The Canadian Free Trade Agreement quietly entered into effect on July 1, 2017, replacing the Agreement on Internal Trade (“AIT”). The Canadian Government’s “BuyandSell.gc.ca website” states:
“The Canadian Free Trade Agreement (CFTA) enters into force on July 1, 2017. The CFTA replaces the Agreement on Internal Trade (AIT), which has been in place since 1995, and will apply to the federal government as well as all provinces and territories. The CFTA will apply to all procurements commenced on or after July 1, 2017, while the AIT will continue to apply to all procurements commenced before July 1, 2017.”
Under Chapter 5 of the AIT (Article 514), the CITT had authority to consider certain federal government procurement bid challenges. The CITT did not review provincial and territorial government procurement cases. The CITT developed procedures for federal government procurement bid challenges (which remain in effect in respect of NAFTA and other free trade agreements). The CITT heard and decided many cases filed under the purview of the AIT.
Where do things stand now that the Canadian Free Trade Agreement applies? Article 518(1) of the new Canadian Free Trade Agreement provides that:
“Each Party shall provide a timely, effective, transparent, and non-discriminatory administrative or judicial review procedure through which a Canadian supplier may challenge:(a) a breach of the Chapter; or(b) if the supplier does not have a right to challenge directly a breach of this Chapter under the laws of a Party, a failure to comply with a Party’s measures implementing this Chapter, arising in the context of a covered procurement, in which the supplier has, or has had, an interest.”
“Each Party shall establish or designate at least one impartial administrative or judicial authority that is independent of its procuring entities to receive and review a challenge by a supplier.”
“If a Party uses an administrative review procedure, findings shall be issued to the supplier within 90 days after the filing of its complaint unless an extension of time is warranted due to extenuating circumstances, in which case the findings will be issued within 135 days after the filing of the complaint.”
“Each supplier shall be allowed a sufficient period of time to prepare and submit a challenge, which in no case shall be less than ten days from the time when the basis of the challenge became known or reasonably should have become known to the supplier.”
“In the event of a complaint by a supplier alleging that there has been a breach or failure as referred to in paragraph 1, the procuring entity and the supplier shall seek to resolve the complaint through consultations. The procuring entity shall accord impartial and timely consideration to the complaint in a manner that is not prejudicial to the supplier’s participation in ongoing or future procurement or its right to seek corrective measures under the administrative or judicial review procedure.”